I just submitted another comment on the page about nofollow. It’s virtually the same but with a bit.ly shortened link. Please delete the version with the long / broken link.

I look forward to staying in touch!

Enjoyed your article. You left a comment earlier today on my article about NoFollow links. You might want to repost with the correct link – the one you’d left in your comment is broken. There’s no way for me to edit your comment, but I can delete the first post if you’d like to leave a second with the correct link.

Look forward to reading more on your site!

However, I’ve been witnessing an interesting notion: Google stopped worrying about nofollow attributes as SEOs started to abuse it. They call it “pagerank sculpting”, which used to work: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/pagerank-sculpting-with-nofollow-still-works.

… and the argument is that it doesn’t work any more: http://hackadelic.com/seo-page-rank-sculpting-my-ass-nofollow-meta-game-over.

As all other things, there was an opportunity, people started abusing it, Google noticed and change the rules. So, the best way to get long-term results with SEO is to:
1. produce quality content,
2. let others link back to you,
3. participate by sharing insights,
4. and be yourself while doing it.

Now we need to prove or disprove the idea that your Twitter profile’s website is a regular link that affects SEO, or is a nofollow….. maybe a test for MythBusters?